|
P3 urges FERC to protect PJM
from pro-gas New Jersey law The
PJM Power Providers (P3) brought a complaint to FERC yesterday, hoping
to insulate
the RTO's
capacity market from a law passed in New Jersey to subsidize natural
gas
plants. The law, signed by Gov
Chris Christie, R, last week, could face legal challenges in other venues, too,
but P3 brought what it could before the FERC, the lobby's
President Glen Thomas told us yesterday.
The group asserted
that FERC
has jurisdiction over the regional wholesale power market,
said
Thomas, including "a
responsibility
to protect consumers in all 14 jurisdictions across the PJM footprint." The
commission should not let New Jersey's "misguided actions … impact those in
other states and those who are investing in the wholesale market under the
market rules."
The law would give about $2 billion to subsidize up to 2,000 MW of
electrical generation in New Jersey, the Sierra Club said
this week. The environmental
group opposes the law on the grounds that it will boost greenhouse gas
emissions.
Potential beneficiaries include LS Power's
West Deptford project, a 1,200 MW combined cycle plant. Competitive
Power Ventures could benefit, too.
New Jersey is not the only state in Eastern PJM to want to build its own
generation outside the capacity market. Maryland
has
a regulatory process open that is looking at doing the same (RT, Jan-31).
A consistent criticism of the capacity market is that it
has
not led to new generation in eastern PJM, though it has
boosted DR significantly in the region. DR
aggregators and their customers oppose the New Jersey law since it
hurts their competitiveness, said
Thomas.
With the lower power demand
due to the economy and efficiency programs, PJM has
recently pushed back projected needs for new capacity in New
Jersey, said
Thomas. PJM
recently predicted the
state will not reach the demand level forecasted for 2014 until
2020.
The P3 complaint lists changes to PJM's
reliability pricing model (RPM) capacity market to insulate
it from the New Jersey law or any other action from any state aimed at
interfering with the federally-regulated wholesale
market.
If
FERC grants the complaint as-is, all
bids
into the capacity auctions would be reviewed to determine
whether they are consistent
with the cost of new generation. Any
generation that
has a
consistent price or can show it did not get a subsidy will be exempt from the
new rules.
Resources trying to "game
the market"
by bidding low costs while simultaneously seeking other customer subsidies would
have
their bids
reset. PJM
and its market monitor would review all
bids. Any
resource that gets its bid
reset would have the right to petition FERC. "FERC cannot allow one state to undermine the markets that other states depend upon," said Thomas. © 2011 GHI LLC |